
The blossom is out, the magnolia tree next door is about to bloom in all its pink and white glory and the annual ‘To Do” list is brushed off and being re-visited. Try as I might to be idle, a compulsive ‘list-maker’ has to learn this skill and approach.
Tidying up – whether it’s the inevitable and unwelcome domestic paperwork, nesting and repairing in the home or the sorting through other people’s possessions when they die or are preparing to die – comes into our lives whether or not we wish it to do so.
Facing up to this, I have decided to begin with bringing my filing system up-to-date, ruthlessly shredding and binning any superfluous paperwork. Working my way through from A-Z. I thought this task would be simple and administrative only. However, apart from cataloguing the content, I find myself meticulously considering each alphabetic conundrum: why is this here, and do I need it?
Some sections of the filing cabinet are easy: A for Aviva, insurance documentation. Mental note: check renewal date, suss out alternative online quotations etc. A for Amnesty International.
Amnesty Raffle tickets, a pound apiece. How many to buy? What about writing another email to the Dear Leader of The People’s Republic of China on the subject of persistant Human Rights abuses, both individual ‘cases’ and more general affrontary to the 1.2 billion population?
A is for Avebury or more precisely my father (formerly Eric Lubbock MP for Orpington 1962-1970) and ever since a continuing campaigner on behalf of numerous individuals and groups whose daily lives are blighted by abuses of their Human Rights. My ‘A’ file on my father contains his will and his wishes.
Along with my brother, I am an executor of his will, and required by both duty and law to see to it that his ‘wishes are fulfilled. He has a Red Box File entitled: ‘Body Disposal Arrangements’ which contains both historical and current requirements for the disposal of his body.
Some years ago, he ‘bequeathed’ his body to The Battersea Dogs Home, requesting that his body be fed to ‘the poor little doggies’ (my father has always liked dogs and cats). Unfortunately, (apart from, as I pointed out at the time, the no-small matter of who would be responsible for cutting up his corpse into chunk-size pieces) they wouldn’t have him anyway as it is, apparently, against the Public Health Order Act’.
I suggested he consider burial at sea but his response was: “I don’t like fish”.
In any event, his long-standing belief in Buddhism offered an attractive (to him) alternative. His body is now to be stripped of its flesh (with the application of a limestone solution and a tailor-made coffin with holes in the base). The bones are then to be ‘knitted’ into a sculpture by a skilled Buddhist monk, entitled “On the Impermanence of Life” and then displayed in a Warwickshire-based Buddhist centre. The only problem with this plan is that The Home Office (with which he is in correspondence on an on-going basis) has strict rules regarding exhumation of bodies, and is usually allowed only in the case of forensic analysis. In September, the responsibility for such matters is transferred to the Department for Constitutional Affairs and, most likely, another whole set of bureaucrats to correspond with.
The alternative is to ship his body out to Thailand but the cost of this is very high as the airlines have strict rules also governing air transportation of bodies (bodies must be transported in zinc-lined coffins; transportation costs are related to weight).
I can see it's going to take me a long, long time to work my way through the filing cabinet.